[1199] τὰν γαμψώνυχα κ.τ.λ. The place of the second adj. may be explained by viewingπαρθένον-χρησμῳδόν as a composite idea: cp. Soph. Phil. 393 “τὸν μέγαν Πάκτωλον-εὔχρυσον”: Soph. OC 1234 “τό τε κατάμεμπτον ... ι γῆρασ-ἄφιλον”: Soph. El. 133 “τὸν ἐμὸν ... πατέρ᾽ ἄθλιον.” So Pind. P. 1.95, 5. 99 etc. This is not like τὸ σὸν στόμα ... ἐλεινόν in 672 (n.). - παρθένον: see on κόρα, 508.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.