previous next

109. The perfect infinitive not in indirect discourse generally represents an act as finished when the present would represent it as going on (96). E.g.

See [ARISTOT.] Nic. vi. 2. 6:οὐκ ἔστι δὲ προαιρετὸν οὐδὲν γεγονὸς, οἷον οὐδεὶς προαιρεῖται Ἴλιον πεπορθηκέναι” , but nothing past can be purposed; for example, nobody purposes to have sacked Ilium, i.e. the expression προαιροῦμαι Ἴλιον πεπορθηκέναι would be nonsense. This illustrates well the restricted use of the perfect infinitive.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (7 total)
  • Commentary references to this page (7):
    • William Watson Goodwin, Commentary on Demosthenes: On the Crown, 107
    • William Watson Goodwin, Commentary on Demosthenes: On the Crown, 2
    • William Watson Goodwin, Commentary on Demosthenes: On the Crown, 22
    • William Watson Goodwin, Commentary on Demosthenes: On the Crown, 257
    • William Watson Goodwin, Commentary on Demosthenes: On the Crown, 286
    • William Watson Goodwin, Commentary on Demosthenes: On the Crown, 30
    • William Watson Goodwin, Commentary on Demosthenes: On the Crown, 46
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: