[284]
The unfortunate Timarchus is still disfranchised because he was a
witness of Aeschines' misdeeds, and why should you allow Aeschines to go
scot-free? If he demanded such severity of retribution from men who had
transgressed only against himself and his friends, what retribution are you, a
legal jury bound by oath, to exact from men who have grievously transgressed
against the commonwealth, and of whom he is proved to be one?
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.