[139]
Again, we must not deviate from this principle, that it
was fair to investigate their merits at the time of conferring the reward, when
none of these men opposed the vote, but after that to let the reward stand,
unless you have received any subsequent wrong at their hands. If they allege
that (for they cannot prove it), it must be shown that the men
were punished at the time of the alleged wrongs. But if you ratify this law,
though no such wrong was committed, it will seem that you have taken away their
reward because you were envious, not because you found them rascals.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.