Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:
book:
section:
section 1section 2section 3section 4section 5section 6section 7section 8section 9section 10section 11section 12section 13section 14section 15section 16section 17section 18section 19section 20section 21section 22section 23section 24section 25section 26section 27section 28section 29section 30section 31section 32section 33section 34section 35section 36section 37section 38section 39section 40section 41
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
Table of Contents:
[7] Again, in the second volume of his Commentaries, Hipparchus accuses Eratosthenes of himself throwing discredit on the statement of Patrocles, on account of his differing with Megasthenes, as to the length of India on its northern side;1 Megasthenes stating the length at 16,000 stadia, and Patrocles at 1000 less. Being biassed by a certain Itinerary, Eratosthenes was led to reject them both on account of this discrepancy, and to follow the Itinerary. If then merely the difference of 1000 stadia is sufficient to cause the authority of Patrocles to be rejected, how much more should this be the case when we find a difference of 8000 stadia between his statement and that of two writers who agree perfectly in theirs, that the breadth of India is 20,000 stadia, while he gives only 12,000!
1 The length of India is its measurement from west to east.
The Geography of Strabo. Literally translated, with notes, in three volumes. London. George Bell & Sons. 1903.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.
show
Browse Bar
hide
Search
hideStable Identifiers
hide
Display Preferences