previous next


and, if MN be subtracted from each,
LM is also in excess of NP;
so that, if GH is in excess of KO, LM is also in excess of NP.

Similarly we can prove that, if GH be equal to KO, LM will also be equal to NP, and if less, less.

And GH, LM are equimultiples of AE, CF, while KO, NP are other, chance, equimultiples of EB, FD;

therefore, as AE is to EB, so is CF to FD.

Therefore etc. Q. E. D.


PROPOSITION 18.

If magnitudes be proportional separando, they will also be proportional componendo.

Let AE, EB, CF, FD be magnitudes proportional separando, so that, as AE is to EB, so is CF to FD; I say that they will also be proportional componendo, that is, as AB is to BE, so is CD to FD.

For, if CD be not to DF as AB to BE, then, as AB is to BE, so will CD be either to some magnitude less than DF or to a greater.

First, let it be in that ratio to a less magnitude DG.

Then, since, as AB is to BE, so is CD to DG, they are magnitudes proportional componendo;

so that they will also be proportional separando. [V. 17]

Therefore, as AE is to EB, so is CG to GD.

But also, by hypothesis,

as AE is to EB, so is CF to FD.

Therefore also, as CG is to GD, so is CF to FD. [V. 11]

But the first CG is greater than the third CF;

therefore the second GD is also greater than the fourth FD. [V. 14]

But it is also less: which is impossible.

Therefore, as AB is to BE, so is not CD to a less magnitude than FD.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: